Rebound Effects: Study Shows New Efficiency Standards for Heavy Trucks Increase Energy Use

A recent study published in Nature Energy demonstrates the unintended consequences of the US government’s latest fuel efficiency standards for heavy-duty trucks. While these regulations aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fuel consumption, the research highlights a rebound effect between fuel efficiency and energy use.

—

In a world where climate change has become a pressing global concern, the transportation sector’s role in greenhouse gas emissions has come under intense scrutiny. 

Heavy-duty trucks are significant contributors to these emissions. While they constitute only 1% of total fleet vehicles, they are responsible for a disproportionate 25% share of global road emissions. In response, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implemented fuel efficiency standards aimed at reducing the carbon footprint of these vehicles. However, a recent study reveals a challenge that threatens to undermine these efforts: the rebound effect.

Conducted by Jonathan Hughes from the University of Colorado at Boulder and James Bushnell from the University of California at Davis, the study investigates how the improved fuel efficiency of heavy-duty trucks could inadvertently lead to higher overall energy consumption, known as the rebound effect. In the context of freight transport, this means more efficient trucks could make trucking cheaper, prompting a shift from rail to truck transport.

Freight Transportation in the US

The freight sector is a major contributor to energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United States. It includes the transportation of goods by truck, train, ship, and plane. Heavy-duty trucks are larger vehicles designed to transport goods and materials over long distances. 

As of recent data, heavy-duty trucks account for approximately 25% of the energy consumption and 23% of GHG emissions from the country’s transportation sector, a 76% increase since 1990. This rise is attributed to the growing demand for quick and flexible delivery options, which trucks provide more effectively than other modes of transport. 

In recent years, the EPA has been proactive in implementing regulations to improve the fuel efficiency of these trucks. The regulations, part of a broader strategy to combat climate change, were introduced in multiple phases. The first phase, initiated in 2011, targeted vehicle models for the years 2014 to 2018. These standards mandated significant enhancements in vehicle, engine, and trailer technologies to boost fuel efficiency.

Building on the initial success, the EPA rolled out Phase 2 of the regulations in 2016, aimed at further improving fuel economy for vehicle models from 2018 to 2027. These updated standards are designed to reduce fuel consumption and emissions by implementing advanced technological improvements in new trucks over time. The goal is to achieve a 19-25% increase in fuel efficiency for new heavy-duty vehicles by 2027 compared to pre-regulation levels.

Rebound Effect of Energy-Efficient Heavy-Duty Trucks

The rebound effect describes where gains in energy efficiency lead to a reduction in operational costs, which can subsequently result in increased usage of a n energy-efficient technology or service. This increase in usage can partially or fully offset the expected energy savings, leading to higher overall energy consumption.

Initially, the study projected significant fuel savings from the new efficiency standards. Without accounting for the rebound effect, the improved fuel economy standards were expected to save approximately 674 million gallons of fuel per year. This projection assumed that the increased efficiency would directly translate to reduced fuel consumption across the board. However, when the rebound effect was taken into consideration, the study revealed a different scenario. 

When trucks become more fuel-efficient, the cost per mile of transportation decreases. This reduction in costs incentivises companies to use trucks more frequently instead of other, less energy-intensive modes of transport such as rail. This shift reduced the anticipated fuel savings to 497 million gallons per year, representing a 26% reduction in the expected benefits. The rebound effect thus significantly diminishes the effectiveness of the fuel efficiency standards in reducing overall energy consumption.

The study also identified specific industries that are particularly susceptible to the rebound effect. Sectors such as chemicals, agriculture, and beverages are highly sensitive to changes in transportation costs. These industries rely heavily on cost-effective logistics for their large volumes of goods, making them more likely to shift to cheaper truck transport when fuel efficiency improves. Consequently, the rebound effect is more pronounced in these sectors, leading to greater increases in truck usage and thus higher overall fuel consumption.

Implications for the Freight Sector and Policy

The study shows that heavy-duty truck fuel economy regulations cause some shipments that would have travelled by more efficient rail transport to be substituted for truck transportation. Analysis of truck fuel economy standards, which ignores this mechanism, can substantially overstate fuel and emissions savings. Understanding these broader system-level impacts is crucial for accurately assessing the effectiveness of such regulations.

These findings therefore have significant implications for future policies, such as those promoting the adoption of electric heavy-duty trucks. While electric trucks promise lower emissions and improved efficiency, they could also trigger rebound effects for similar reasons. As electric trucks become more prevalent and cost-competitive, they may increasingly compete with rail for shorter shipments. This competition could further exacerbate the modal shift from rail to road, particularly if electric trucks are primarily deployed on shorter, more frequent routes where they hold a logistical advantage. Policies should aim to make electric trucks complementary to rail rather than competitive, encouraging their use in ways that enhance overall transport efficiency.

However, the rebound effects observed in the study are analogous to those seen in passenger travel, buildings, and energy-consuming durable goods, where improvements in energy efficiency can lead to increased usage of more energy-intensive options. This emphasises the need for attention to how energy efficiency policies influence technology choices across various sectors rather than specific technologies. 

For future policy development, comprehensive impact assessments are crucial. These assessments should account for potential mode substitutions and other rebound effects to provide a more accurate picture of the net benefits of fuel economy regulations and other energy efficiency initiatives. Integrated transport planning is also necessary, aligning truck and rail transport policies to maximise efficiency and minimise emissions. By encouraging the use of the most efficient transport mode for each type of shipment and investing in technologies that facilitate seamless transfers between trucks and trains, policymakers can ensure that energy efficiency improvements translate into real-world benefits.